Update: Hulk Hogan Looking At Possible Jail Time For Telling Lies Under Oath?

As we reported on Saturday afternoon, The National Enquirer ran a story this week regarding the possibility that WWE Hall Of Famer Hulk Hogan perjured himself in a deposition.

The following is the entire relevant portion of the July 2nd hearing transcript that’s being referred to and used as evidence in the case involving Hogan (Terry Bollea.)

The context one would need to know when reading the following is that Gawker attorney Seth Berlin is trying to get the F.B.I. to re-issue documents regarding their investigation into the sex-tape extortion attempt without redactions that should not have been made.

“But what these documents show, and then I’ll come back and I can talk a little bit about the exemptions and the indexes, but let me tell you what our concern is, Your Honor. So in this investigation what we know is that Mr. Bollea — this is not — I’m not treading on secret ground here. What we know is that Mr. Bollea came with his lawyer, Mr. Houston, to the FBI and asked for an investigation, which they conducted. And what we know from Mr. Hardy’s last declaration is that part of this investigation yielded three DVDs that have encounters involving the three key participants in this — Mrs. Clem, Mr. Bollea, and for portions of it Mr. Clem.

Each of those people has testified differently, they have all said different things about what actually happened, when it happened, how often it happened, whether — what was known. And so one of the reasons why we said we would like to get — we started by just saying look, we thought we would find, which we eventually got in yesterday’s stack, statements by Mr. Bollea and his lawyer, and to see whether what he was saying to the FBI matched what he is saying in our lawsuit.

Turns out, without getting into the specifics, they don’t, that we have essentially under oath testimony to the FBI and we have under oath testimony in our case directly at odds with one another. So we have a situation — and it’s very unfortunate that this is two days or one business day before we’re supposed to start a trial on this matter, but we have a situation where the key participant, the plaintiff, is telling us one thing under oath and telling the FBI something else. So this is why we’re asking — and you can’t use that document to impeach a person if there is a bunch of blanks in it that somebody is saying well, that’s private even though it’s already public.”

• VERY Detailed Post: Steve Austin DEFENDS Dana White’s “FAKE” Comments, UFC Champ Does NOT!

(Partial Credit: F4WOnline.com)